Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness

Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules

de

, ,

Éditeur :

Springer


Collection :

Argumentation Library

Paru le : 2009-08-05



eBook Téléchargement , DRM LCP 🛈 DRM Adobe 🛈
Lecture en ligne (streaming)
94,94

Téléchargement immédiat
Dès validation de votre commande
Ajouter à ma liste d'envies
Image Louise Reader présentation

Louise Reader

Lisez ce titre sur l'application Louise Reader.

Description
In Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness, Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Bert Meuffels report on their systematic empirical research of the conventional validity of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. The experimental studies they carried out during more than ten years start from the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation developed at the University of Amsterdam, their home university. In these studies they test methodically the intersubjective acceptability of the rules for critical discussion proposed in this theory by confronting ordinary arguers who have not received any special education in argumentation and fallacies with discussion fragments containing both fallacious and non-fallacious argumentative moves. The research covers a wide range of informal fallacies. In this way, the authors create a basis for comparing the theoretical reasonableness conception of pragma-dialectics with the norms for judging argumentative moves prevailing in argumentative practice. Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness provides a unique insight into the relationship between theoretical and practical conceptions of reasonableness, supported by extensive empirical material gained by means of sophisticated experimental research.
Pages
231 pages
Collection
Argumentation Library
Parution
2009-08-05
Marque
Springer
EAN papier
9789048126132
EAN EPUB
9789048126149

Informations sur l'ebook
Nombre pages copiables
2
Nombre pages imprimables
23
Taille du fichier
338 Ko
Prix
94,94 €